IFLP(CONICET)
Dirac demonstrated that the existence of a single magnetic monopole in the universe could explain the discrete nature of electric charge. Magnetic monopoles naturally arise in most grand unified theories. However, the extensive experimental searches conducted thus far have not been successful. Here, we propose a mechanism in which magnetic monopoles bind deeply with neutral states, effectively hiding some of the properties of free monopoles. We explore various scenarios for these systems and analyze their detectability. In particular, one scenario is especially interesting, as it predicts a light state-an analog of an electron but with magnetic charge instead of electric charge-which we refer to as a magnetron.
The degree of experimentally attainable nonlocality, as gauged by the loophole-free or effective violation of Bell inequalities, remains severely limited due to inefficient detectors. We address an experimentally motivated question: Which quantum strategies attain the maximal loophole-free nonlocality in the presence of inefficient detectors? For any Bell inequality and any specification of detection efficiencies, the optimal strategies are those that maximally violate a tilted version of the Bell inequality in ideal conditions. In the simplest scenario, we demonstrate that the quantum strategies that maximally violate the doubly-tilted versions of Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt inequality are unique up to local isometries. We utilize a Jordan's lemma and Gröbner basis-based proof technique to analytically derive self-testing statements for the entire family of doubly-tilted CHSH inequalities and numerically demonstrate their robustness. These results enable us to reveal the insufficiency of even high levels of the Navascués--Pironio--Acín hierarchy to saturate the maximum quantum violation of these inequalities.
In this work, we perform a comprehensive study of the machine learning (ML) methods for the purpose of characterising the quantum set of correlations. As our main focus is on assessing the usefulness and effectiveness of the ML approach, we focus exclusively on the CHSH scenario, both the 4-dimensional variant, for which an analytical solution is known, and the 8-dimensional variant, for which no analytical solution is known, but numerical approaches are relatively well understood. We consider a wide selection of approaches, ranging from simple data science models to dense neural networks. The two classes of models that perform well are support vector machines and dense neural networks, and they are the main focus of this work. We conclude that while it is relatively easy to achieve good performance on average, it is hard to train a model that performs well on the "hard" cases, i.e., points in the vicinity of the boundary of the quantum set. Sadly, these are precisely the cases which are interesting from the academic point of view. In order to improve performance on hard cases one must, especially for the 8-dimensional problem, resort to a tailored choice of training data, which means that we are implicitly feeding our intuition and biases into the model. We feel that this is an important and often overlooked aspect of applying ML models to academic problems, where data generation or data selection is performed according to some implicit subjective criteria. In this way, it is possible to unconsciously steer our model, so that it exhibits features that we are interested in seeing. Hence, special care must be taken while determining whether ML methods can be considered objective and unbiased in the context of academic problems.
There are no more papers matching your filters at the moment.