The introduction of Integrated Sensing and Communications (ISAC) in cellular systems is not expected to result in a shift away from the popular choice of cost- and energy-efficient analog or hybrid beamforming structures. However, this comes at the cost of limiting the angular capabilities to a confined space per acquisitions. Thus, as a prerequisite for the successful implementation of numerous ISAC use cases, the need for an optimal angular estimation of targets and their separation based on the minimal number of angular samples arises. In this work, different approaches for angular estimation based on a minimal, DFT-based set of angular samples are evaluated. The samples are acquired through sweeping multiple beams of an ISAC proof of concept (PoC) in the industrial scenario of the ARENA2036. The study's findings indicate that interpolation approaches are more effective for generalizing across different types of angular scenarios. While the orthogonal matching pursuit (OMP) approach exhibits the most accurate estimation for a single, strong and clearly discriminable target, the DFT-based interpolation approach demonstrates the best overall estimation performance.

Peak detection is a fundamental task in radar and has therefore been studied extensively in radar literature. However, Integrated Sensing and Communication (ISAC) systems for sixth generation (6G) cellular networks need to perform peak detection under hardware impairments and constraints imposed by the underlying system designed for communications. This paper presents a comparative study of classical Constant False Alarm Rate (CFAR)-based algorithms and a recently proposed Convolutional Neural Network (CNN)-based method for peak detection in ISAC radar images. To impose practical constraints of ISAC systems, we model the impact of hardware impairments, such as power amplifier nonlinearities and quantization noise. We perform extensive simulation campaigns focusing on multi-target detection under varying noise as well as on target separation in resolution-limited scenarios. The results show that CFAR detectors require approximate knowledge of the operating scenario and the use of window functions for reliable performance. The CNN, on the other hand, achieves high performance in all scenarios, but requires a preprocessing step for the input data.