Mullard Space Science Laboratory
This work introduces highly accelerated and differentiable directional wavelet transforms for data on the 2D sphere (S²) and 3D ball (B³), implemented in JAX. It provides S2WAV and S2BALL, open-source software libraries enabling seamless integration of multiscale, anisotropic signal processing with modern machine learning frameworks, while achieving orders of magnitude speedups.
23
University of Washington logoUniversity of WashingtonCNRS logoCNRSCalifornia Institute of Technology logoCalifornia Institute of TechnologyUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign logoUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignSLAC National Accelerator LaboratoryNational Central UniversityUCLA logoUCLACarnegie Mellon University logoCarnegie Mellon UniversityImperial College London logoImperial College LondonDESYUniversity of Chicago logoUniversity of ChicagoUC Berkeley logoUC BerkeleyUniversity College London logoUniversity College LondonUniversity of Oxford logoUniversity of Oxfordthe University of Tokyo logothe University of TokyoStanford University logoStanford UniversityUniversity of EdinburghINFN logoINFNETH Zürich logoETH ZürichUniversity of California, San Diego logoUniversity of California, San DiegoUniversity of British Columbia logoUniversity of British ColumbiaNASA Goddard Space Flight Center logoNASA Goddard Space Flight CenterUniversity of Texas at Austin logoUniversity of Texas at AustinKavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the UniverseCurtin UniversityCERN logoCERNSpace Telescope Science Institute logoSpace Telescope Science InstituteJohns Hopkins University logoJohns Hopkins UniversityArizona State University logoArizona State UniversityUniversity of Maryland logoUniversity of MarylandThe Alan Turing InstituteUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillPurdue University logoPurdue UniversityUniversity of HelsinkiPolitecnico di MilanoUniversity of California, Davis logoUniversity of California, DavisDuke University logoDuke UniversityMIT logoMITCEA logoCEAPrinceton University logoPrinceton UniversityUniv. LilleUniversity of Central Florida logoUniversity of Central FloridaUniversity of Colorado BoulderUniversité Côte d’AzurUniversidade Federal do Rio de JaneiroNorthern Arizona UniversityJet Propulsion LaboratoryUniversidad de ChileEuropean Space AgencyUniversity of MontenegroCNESAdam Mickiewicz UniversityPSL Research UniversitySouthwest Research InstituteSETI InstituteUniversity of North DakotaThe Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics LaboratoryObservatoire de la Côte d’AzurUniversity of Hawai’iCalifornia State Polytechnic University, PomonaThe University of ArizonaMIT Kavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space ResearchUniversidade Federal de SergipeKavli Institute for Cosmological PhysicsThe Open UniversityCarnegie Institution for ScienceUniversidad Nacional de ColombiaVera C. Rubin ObservatoryCEA SaclayCNRS/IN2P3Queen's University BelfastInstituto de Astrofísica de Canarias (IAC)Lowell ObservatoryIPACLAPPUniv Grenoble AlpesIJCLabU.S. Naval ObservatoryPlanetary Science InstituteNSF’s National Optical-Infrared Astronomy Research LaboratoryPontificia Universidad Catolica de ChileUniversidad MayorLPNHEUniversities Space Research AssociationAcademia Sinica Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics (ASIAA)California Polytechnic State University - San Luis ObispoMullard Space Science LaboratoryELTE Gothard Astrophysical ObservatoryParis ObservatoryAstroparticule et Cosmologie (APC)Universit\`a degli Studi di Urbino ‘Carlo Bo’Universit´e Paris DiderotIMCCEELTE Eotvos Lorand UniversityAix-Marseille Universit\'eUK ATCLaboratoire d’Astrophysique de Marseille (LAM)Observatorio Astronomico NacionalInstituto Nacional de Astrofısica Optica y ElectronicaObservatorio do ValongoEarth and Planets LaboratoryUniversit´e Paris Cit´eLSST Discovery AllianceUTFPR— Universidade Tecnol´ogica Federal do Paran´aInstituto de Ciencias Planetarias y Exoplanetarias (ICPE)CONICET-IARLaborat´orio Nacional de Astrof´ısica (LNA)The ExploratoriumELKH-CSFK Konkoly ObservatoryObservat´orio Nacional, MCTILudwig-Maximilians-Universität MünchenNASA, Ames Research CenterUniversité Paris-SaclayCenter for Astrophysics  Harvard & SmithsonianINAF ` Osservatorio Astronomico di TriesteSorbonne Université
We report on the observation and measurement of astrometry, photometry, morphology, and activity of the interstellar object 3I/ATLAS, also designated C/2025 N1 (ATLAS), with the NSF-DOE Vera C. Rubin Observatory. The third interstellar object, comet 3I/ATLAS, was first discovered on UT 2025 July 1. Serendipitously, the Rubin Observatory collected imaging in the area of the sky inhabited by the object during regular commissioning activities. We successfully recovered object detections from Rubin visits spanning UT 2025 June 21 (10 days before discovery) to UT 2025 July 7. Facilitated by Rubin's high resolution and large aperture, we report on the detection of cometary activity as early as June 21st, and observe it throughout. We measure the location and magnitude of the object on 37 Rubin images in r, i, and z bands, with typical precision of about 20 mas (100 mas, systematic) and about 10 mmag, respectively. We use these to derive improved orbit solutions, and to show there is no detectable photometric variability on hourly timescales. We derive a V-band absolute magnitude of H_V = (13.7 +/- 0.2) mag, and an equivalent effective nucleus radius of around (5.6 +/- 0.7) km. These data represent the earliest observations of this object by a large (8-meter class) telescope reported to date, and illustrate the type of measurements (and discoveries) Rubin's Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST) will begin to provide once operational later this year.
Using 3D GRMHD simulations with a hybrid thermal-nonthermal electron distribution, researchers explain M87's observed larger 86 GHz ring compared to its 230 GHz counterpart. The model successfully reproduces observed ring diameters at both frequencies, with the 86 GHz expansion linked to dynamic magnetic flux eruption events within a magnetically arrested disk and an adjusted estimate for M87's angular gravitational radius.
CNRS logoCNRSCalifornia Institute of Technology logoCalifornia Institute of TechnologyUniversity of OsloINFN Sezione di NapoliUniversity of Waterloo logoUniversity of WaterlooSLAC National Accelerator LaboratoryUniversity of UtahUniversity College London logoUniversity College Londonthe University of Tokyo logothe University of TokyoStanford University logoStanford UniversityUniversity of Copenhagen logoUniversity of CopenhagenUniversity of EdinburghCSICNASA Goddard Space Flight Center logoNASA Goddard Space Flight CenterLancaster UniversityCollège de FranceUniversité Paris-Saclay logoUniversité Paris-SaclayHelsinki Institute of PhysicsLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory logoLawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryUniversity of HelsinkiPerimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics logoPerimeter Institute for Theoretical PhysicsSorbonne Université logoSorbonne UniversitéLeiden University logoLeiden UniversityMacquarie UniversityCEA logoCEAUniversity of GenevaÉcole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL)University of ViennaLiverpool John Moores UniversityUniversity of PortsmouthAlma Mater Studiorum - Università di BolognaLudwig-Maximilians-Universität MünchenUniversität BonnUniversità di GenovaUniversidade do PortoTechnical University of DenmarkINAF - Osservatorio Astrofisico di TorinoUniversité Côte d’AzurDurham University logoDurham UniversityUniversity of Groningen logoUniversity of GroningenInstituto de Astrofísica e Ciências do EspaçoNiels Bohr InstituteJet Propulsion LaboratoryUniversity of LiègeInstituto de Astrofísica de CanariasUniversidad de ChileUniversity of NottinghamNational Research Council of CanadaCNESINFN, Sezione di TorinoUniversité de MonsUniversidad de La LagunaUniversidad de CantabriaELTE Eötvös Loránd UniversityUniversity of Hawai’iFaculdade de Ciências da Universidade de LisboaThe Open UniversityEuropean Space Astronomy Centre (ESAC)INAF – Istituto di Astrofisica e Planetologia SpazialiKapteyn Astronomical InstituteThe Barcelona Institute of Science and TechnologyRoyal ObservatoryINAF – Osservatorio Astronomico di RomaDonostia International Physics Center DIPCInstitut d'Astrophysique de ParisInstitut de Física d’Altes Energies (IFAE)Institut d’Estudis Espacials de Catalunya (IEEC)INFN - Sezione di PadovaInstituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía (IAA)SRON Netherlands Institute for Space ResearchIJCLabESA/ESTECINAF-IASF MilanoInstitute of Space ScienceInstitut d’Astrophysique SpatialeINFN-Sezione di GenovaLAMEuropean Space Agency (ESA)INFN-Sezione di BolognaKavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and CosmologyHamburger SternwarteUniversidad Politécnica de CartagenaInstitució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA)Millennium Institute of Astrophysics (MAS)CPPMCentre National d’Etudes SpatialesWaterloo Centre for AstrophysicsHerzberg Astronomy and AstrophysicsMullard Space Science LaboratoryIP2I LyonInstitut de Recherche en Astrophysique et Planétologie (IRAP)University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland (SUPSI)OCAInstitute of Space Sciences (ICE)Universidad de ConcepciٞnKavli IPMU (WPI)Observatoire de SauvernyDanish Space Research InstituteDeutsches SOFIA InstitutGothard Astrophysical ObservatoryPort d'Informació Científica (PIC)LagrangeMTA-ELTE Extragalactic Astrophysics Research GroupNOVA, Dutch Research School for AstronomyIFCA, Instituto de Física de CantabriaUKRI-STFCINFN-Sezione di Roma TreINFN-Sezione di FerraraCosmic Dawn Center(DAWN)Universit Claude Bernard Lyon 1Universit di FerraraINAF Osservatorio Astronomico di CapodimonteMax Planck Institut fr AstronomieAix-Marseille Universit",Universit degli Studi di PadovaRWTH Aachen UniversityMax Planck-Institute for Extraterrestrial PhysicsCentre de Recherches Astrophysiques de LyonUniversit degli Studi di MilanoUniversit degli Studi di TorinoUniversit degli Studi di Napoli Federico IIINAF Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di BolognaIFPU Institute for fundamental physics of the UniverseINFN Sezione di TriesteINAF ` Osservatorio Astronomico di TriesteUniversit degli Studi di TriesteINAF Osservatorio Astronomico di Brera
The Euclid Collaboration developed a strong lensing discovery engine combining machine learning, citizen science, and expert assessment, leading to the identification of 497 strong gravitational lens candidates from the Euclid Quick Data Release 1. This includes 243 previously unpublished high-confidence candidates and demonstrates a detection rate of 20.3 lens candidates per square degree, with a significant number having small Einstein radii below 1 arcsecond.
Understanding the Milky Way disc formation requires characterising its structural and kinematic properties as functions of stellar age. Using red giant stars from APOGEE DR17 and Gaia DR3, we model the age-dependent stellar kinematics with a quasi-isothermal distribution function and fit disc parameters as a function of age using non-parametric splines. We identify a transition from thick to thin disc populations around 10 Gyr ago. Stars older than this have short scale lengths (\sim1.7 kpc), typical of the thick disc, while younger stars exhibit increasing scale length with decreasing age, consistent with inside-out formation of the thin disc. This transition coincides with the end of the starburst triggered by the Gaia-Sausage-Enceladus (GSE) merger. Stars formed around 10 Gyr ago exhibit a dip in scale length, even shorter than that of the thick disc. Comparison with an Auriga simulation suggests that this scale-length dip reflects gas disc shrinking caused by the transition from a cold to hot gas accretion mode. We propose the following disc formation scenario: (1) the thick disc formed under cold-mode accretion; (2) the GSE merger triggered a starburst and increased the total mass of the Galaxy, causing the transition to hot-mode accretion; (3) rapid gas consumption led to temporary shrinking of the star-forming gas disc; and then (4) thin disc grows in an inside-out fashion, as the size of the star-forming gas disc grows via hot-mode smooth gas accretion.
ETH Zurich logoETH ZurichCNRS logoCNRSCalifornia Institute of Technology logoCalifornia Institute of TechnologyUniversity of OsloHeidelberg UniversityUniversity of Waterloo logoUniversity of WaterlooUniversity College London logoUniversity College LondonUniversity of Oxford logoUniversity of OxfordUniversity of Copenhagen logoUniversity of CopenhagenUniversity of EdinburghINFN logoINFNCSICNASA Goddard Space Flight Center logoNASA Goddard Space Flight CenterHelsinki Institute of PhysicsStockholm University logoStockholm UniversityUniversity of HelsinkiPerimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics logoPerimeter Institute for Theoretical PhysicsUniversité de GenèveSorbonne Université logoSorbonne UniversitéLeiden University logoLeiden UniversityUniversity of PortsmouthLudwig-Maximilians-Universität MünchenUniversität BonnKTH Royal Institute of Technology logoKTH Royal Institute of TechnologyUniversity of OuluObservatoire de ParisTechnical University of DenmarkINAF - Osservatorio Astrofisico di TorinoDurham University logoDurham UniversityUniversity of Groningen logoUniversity of GroningenInstituto de Astrofísica e Ciências do EspaçoNiels Bohr InstituteJet Propulsion LaboratoryInstituto de Astrofísica de CanariasUniversity of NottinghamÉcole Polytechnique Fédérale de LausanneSISSAUniversità degli Studi di BolognaUniversidad de La LagunaDonostia International Physics CenterUniversity of Hawai’iFaculdade de Ciências da Universidade de LisboaUniversité Toulouse III - Paul SabatierINAF – Istituto di Astrofisica e Planetologia SpazialiKapteyn Astronomical InstituteMax Planck Institute for AstronomyThe Barcelona Institute of Science and TechnologyIstanbul UniversityLaboratoire d’Astrophysique de MarseilleNORDITAInstitut de Ciències de l’EspaiInstitut d’Estudis Espacials de CatalunyaINAF – Osservatorio Astronomico di RomaIKERBASQUE-Basque Foundation for ScienceInstitut d'Astrophysique de ParisUniversidad de SalamancaInstitució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis AvançatsIFPUSRON Netherlands Institute for Space ResearchInstitut de Physique des 2 Infinis de LyonInstitute of Space ScienceCosmic Dawn CenterESAAgenzia Spaziale ItalianaUniversitäts-Sternwarte MünchenInstitute for Fundamental Physics of the UniverseCentre de Recherche Astrophysique de LyonArgelander-Institut für AstronomieUniversidad Politécnica de CartagenaUniversità degli Studi di Roma La SapienzaInstitut de Física d’Altes EnergiesCPPMAPCMullard Space Science LaboratoryCEA Paris-SaclayInstitute of Theoretical AstrophysicsLaboratoire de Physique Nucléaire et de Hautes ÉnergiesObservatoire de SauvernyDanish Space Research InstituteUniversit degli Studi di FerraraUniversit degli Studi di GenovaUniversit Claude Bernard Lyon 1INAF Osservatorio Astronomico di CapodimonteAix-Marseille Universit",Universit degli Studi di PadovaUniversit Paris CitMax Planck-Institute for Extraterrestrial PhysicsUniversit de LyonUniversit degli Studi di MilanoUniversit degli Studi di Milano-BicoccaUniversit degli Studi di Napoli Federico IIINAF Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di BolognaUniversit degli Studi di TriesteINAF Osservatorio Astronomico di Brera
The Euclid mission aims to measure the positions, shapes, and redshifts of over a billion galaxies to provide unprecedented constraints on the nature of dark matter and dark energy. Achieving this goal requires a continuous reassessment of the mission's scientific performance, particularly in terms of its ability to constrain cosmological parameters, as our understanding of how to model large-scale structure observables improves. In this study, we present the first scientific forecasts using CLOE (Cosmology Likelihood for Observables in Euclid), a dedicated Euclid cosmological pipeline developed to support this endeavour. Using advanced Bayesian inference techniques applied to synthetic Euclid-like data, we sample the posterior distribution of cosmological and nuisance parameters across a variety of cosmological models and Euclid primary probes: cosmic shear, angular photometric galaxy clustering, galaxy-galaxy lensing, and spectroscopic galaxy clustering. We validate the capability of CLOE to produce reliable cosmological forecasts, showcasing Euclid's potential to achieve a figure of merit for the dark energy parameters w0w_0 and waw_a exceeding 400 when combining all primary probes. Furthermore, we illustrate the behaviour of the posterior probability distribution of the parameters of interest given different priors and scale cuts. Finally, we emphasise the importance of addressing computational challenges, proposing further exploration of innovative data science techniques to efficiently navigate the Euclid high-dimensional parameter space in upcoming cosmological data releases.
CNRS logoCNRSCalifornia Institute of Technology logoCalifornia Institute of TechnologyUniversity of OsloHeidelberg UniversityINFN Sezione di NapoliUniversity of Waterloo logoUniversity of WaterlooSLAC National Accelerator LaboratoryUniversity of Manchester logoUniversity of ManchesterUniversity of ZurichUniversity College London logoUniversity College LondonUniversity of California, Irvine logoUniversity of California, IrvineStanford University logoStanford UniversityUniversity of Copenhagen logoUniversity of CopenhagenUniversity of EdinburghPennsylvania State UniversityCSICNASA Goddard Space Flight Center logoNASA Goddard Space Flight CenterCONICETLancaster UniversitySouthern Methodist UniversityRadboud UniversityThe University of Texas at DallasUniversité Paris-Saclay logoUniversité Paris-SaclayHelsinki Institute of PhysicsUniversity of HelsinkiKing’s College London logoKing’s College LondonUniversité de GenèveSorbonne Université logoSorbonne UniversitéUniversity of TurkuPrinceton University logoPrinceton UniversityÉcole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL)Liverpool John Moores UniversityUniversity of PortsmouthAlma Mater Studiorum - Università di BolognaINAF-IAPSLudwig-Maximilians-Universität MünchenUniversität BonnFlatiron Institute logoFlatiron InstituteUniversità di GenovaUniversité de NeuchâtelUniversidade do PortoUniversity of SussexUniversity of OuluObservatoire de ParisTechnical University of DenmarkDurham University logoDurham UniversityInstituto de Astrofísica e Ciências do EspaçoNiels Bohr InstituteJet Propulsion LaboratoryInstituto de Astrofísica de CanariasRuhr-Universität BochumSISSACNESUniversità di ParmaUniversidad de La LagunaUniversidad de CantabriaINFN, Laboratori Nazionali di FrascatiConsejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)University of Hawai’iINFN, Sezione di MilanoFaculdade de Ciências da Universidade de LisboaUniversität BielefeldASI Space Science Data CenterObservatoire astronomique de StrasbourgThe Barcelona Institute of Science and TechnologyCEA SaclayCNRS/IN2P3INAF - Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello SpazioInstituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía, IAA-CSICINAF – Osservatorio Astronomico di RomaGrenoble-INPInstitut d'Astrophysique de ParisUniversidad de SalamancaInstitut de Física d’Altes Energies (IFAE)Institut d’Estudis Espacials de Catalunya (IEEC)Univ Grenoble AlpesINFN - Sezione di PadovaIPAGINAF-IASF MilanoUniversidad de MurciaInstitute of Space ScienceINFN-Sezione di GenovaDTU SpaceEuropean Space Agency (ESA)INFN-Sezione di BolognaKavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and CosmologyUNLPUniversità degli Studi di Roma La SapienzaLAM (Laboratoire d’Astrophysique de Marseille)Astroparticule et CosmologieAIMCPPMASI - Agenzia Spaziale ItalianaLERMAInstituto de Física Teórica UAM/CSICMullard Space Science LaboratoryLaboratoire de Physique Subatomique et de CosmologieCSIC-Universidad de CantabriaESTECInstitute for Gravitation and the CosmosUAMAurora TechnologyINSUINAF - Osservatorio Astronomico di TorinoUniversidad de ConcepciٞnESACCenter for Computational AstrophysicsLaboratoire de Physique Théorique et Hautes EnergiesInstitut de Physique des 2 Infinis de Lyon (IP2I)Port d’Informació CientíficaInstituto Argentino de Radioastronomía (IAR)LPSC-Université Grenoble AlpesC.A.U.P.ESRINDanish National Space CentreIFCA, Instituto de Física de CantabriaUniversit PSLINFN-Sezione di FerraraCosmic Dawn Center(DAWN)Institute of Space Sciences (ICE–CSIC)INFN National Institute for Nuclear PhysicsUniversit Claude Bernard Lyon 1INAF Osservatorio Astronomico di CapodimonteMax Planck Institut fr AstronomieAix-Marseille Universit",Universit Paris CitInstitut de Physique Nucléaire de Lyon (IPNL)DRF/IRFUDEDIPINFN – Sezione di FirenzeSerco FinlandUniversit de StrasbourgMax Planck-Institute for Extraterrestrial PhysicsUniversit de LyonSapienza Universit di RomaUniversit di PadovaINAF Osservatorio Astrofisico di ArcetriUniversit degli Studi di MilanoUniversit degli Studi di FirenzeUniversit degli Studi di Napoli Federico IIINAF Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di BolognaUniversit Di BolognaIFPU Institute for fundamental physics of the UniverseINAF ` Osservatorio Astronomico di TriesteUniversit degli Studi di TriesteINAF Osservatorio Astronomico di Brera
We compare the performance of the flat-sky approximation and Limber approximation for the clustering analysis of the photometric galaxy catalogue of Euclid. We study a 6 bin configuration representing the first data release (DR1) and a 13 bin configuration representative of the third and final data release (DR3). We find that the Limber approximation is sufficiently accurate for the analysis of the wide bins of DR1. Contrarily, the 13 bins of DR3 cannot be modelled accurately with the Limber approximation. Instead, the flat-sky approximation is accurate to below 5%5\% in recovering the angular power spectra of galaxy number counts in both cases and can be used to simplify the computation of the full power spectrum in harmonic space for the data analysis of DR3.
ETH Zurich logoETH ZurichCNRS logoCNRSUniversity of Cambridge logoUniversity of CambridgeTel Aviv University logoTel Aviv UniversityUniversity College London logoUniversity College LondonUniversity of EdinburghUniversidade de LisboaTechnische Universität DresdenKU Leuven logoKU LeuvenRadboud UniversityUniversität HeidelbergUniversity of HelsinkiUppsala UniversityUniversity of Arizona logoUniversity of ArizonaSorbonne Université logoSorbonne UniversitéLeiden University logoLeiden UniversityUniversity of GenevaUniversity of ViennaUniversitat de BarcelonaUniversity of LeicesterObservatoire de ParisUniversité de LiègeINAF - Osservatorio Astrofisico di TorinoUniversité Côte d’AzurUniversity of Groningen logoUniversity of GroningenClemson UniversityLund UniversityUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoSwinburne University of TechnologyUniversität HamburgThales Alenia SpaceEuropean Southern Observatory logoEuropean Southern ObservatoryLaboratoire d’Astrophysique de BordeauxSISSACNESUniversity of CalgaryUniversidad de La LagunaIMT AtlantiqueObservatoire de la Côte d’AzurEuropean Space Astronomy Centre (ESAC)Kapteyn Astronomical InstituteObservatoire astronomique de StrasbourgNational Observatory of AthensQueen's University BelfastUniversidade de Santiago de CompostelaINAF – Osservatorio Astronomico di RomaInstituto de Astrofísica de Canarias (IAC)Universidade da CoruñaINAF – Osservatorio Astronomico d’AbruzzoSRON Netherlands Institute for Space ResearchINAF - Osservatorio Astrofisico di CataniaUniversidade de VigoRoyal Observatory of BelgiumINAF- Osservatorio Astronomico di CagliariLeibniz-Institut für Astrophysik Potsdam (AIP)F.R.S.-FNRSTelespazio FRANCEAirbus Defence and SpaceInstituto Galego de Física de Altas Enerxías (IGFAE)Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya-BarcelonaTechSTAR InstituteEuropean Space Agency (ESA)Lund ObservatoryGeneva University HospitalLeiden ObservatoryFinnish Geospatial Research Institute FGICGIAgenzia Spaziale Italiana (ASI)Mullard Space Science LaboratoryInstitut de Ciències del Cosmos (ICCUB)Aurora TechnologyCentro de Supercomputación de Galicia (CESGA)Institut UTINAMGEPISERCOInstitut d’Astronomie et d’AstrophysiqueGMV Innovating Solutions S.L.Space Science Data Center (SSDC)Wallonia Space Centre (CSW)Indra Sistemas S.A.Universit PSL* National and Kapodistrian University of AthensUniversit de ToulouseUniversit Bourgogne Franche-ComtUniversit Libre de BruxellesIstituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare INFNMax Planck Institut fr AstronomieUniversit de LorraineUniversit de BordeauxUniversit de StrasbourgUniversit di PadovaINAF Osservatorio Astrofisico di ArcetriINAF Osservatorio Astronomico di PadovaAstronomisches Rechen–InstitutINAF Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di Bologna
We produce a clean and well-characterised catalogue of objects within 100\,pc of the Sun from the \G\ Early Data Release 3. We characterise the catalogue through comparisons to the full data release, external catalogues, and simulations. We carry out a first analysis of the science that is possible with this sample to demonstrate its potential and best practices for its use. The selection of objects within 100\,pc from the full catalogue used selected training sets, machine-learning procedures, astrometric quantities, and solution quality indicators to determine a probability that the astrometric solution is reliable. The training set construction exploited the astrometric data, quality flags, and external photometry. For all candidates we calculated distance posterior probability densities using Bayesian procedures and mock catalogues to define priors. Any object with reliable astrometry and a non-zero probability of being within 100\,pc is included in the catalogue. We have produced a catalogue of \NFINAL\ objects that we estimate contains at least 92\% of stars of stellar type M9 within 100\,pc of the Sun. We estimate that 9\% of the stars in this catalogue probably lie outside 100\,pc, but when the distance probability function is used, a correct treatment of this contamination is possible. We produced luminosity functions with a high signal-to-noise ratio for the main-sequence stars, giants, and white dwarfs. We examined in detail the Hyades cluster, the white dwarf population, and wide-binary systems and produced candidate lists for all three samples. We detected local manifestations of several streams, superclusters, and halo objects, in which we identified 12 members of \G\ Enceladus. We present the first direct parallaxes of five objects in multiple systems within 10\,pc of the Sun.
We present the largest, most homogeneous catalogue of merging galaxies in the nearby universe obtained through the Galaxy Zoo project - an interface on the world-wide web enabling large-scale morphological classification of galaxies through visual inspection of images from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS). The method converts a set of visually-inspected classifications for each galaxy into a single parameter (the `weighted-merger-vote fraction,' fmf_m) which describes our confidence that the system is part of an ongoing merger. We describe how fmf_m is used to create a catalogue of 3003 visually-selected pairs of merging galaxies from the SDSS in the redshift range 0.005 < z <0.1. We use our merger sample and values of fmf_m applied to the SDSS Main Galaxy Spectral sample (MGS) to estimate that the fraction of volume-limited (M_r < -20.55) major mergers (1/3 < {M}^*_1/{M}^*_2 < 3) in the nearby universe is 13×C1 - 3 \times C% where C1.5C \sim 1.5 is a correction factor for spectroscopic incompleteness. Having visually classified the morphologies of the constituent galaxies in our mergers, we find that the spiral-to-elliptical ratio of galaxies in mergers is higher by a factor 2\sim 2 relative to the global population. In a companion paper, we examine the internal properties of these merging galaxies and conclude that this high spiral-to-elliptical ratio in mergers is due to a longer time-scale over which mergers with spirals are detectable compared to mergers with ellipticals.
The Mid-Infrared Instrument (MIRI) on the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), has imaging, four coronagraphs and both low and medium resolution spectroscopic modes . Being able to simulate MIRI observations will help commissioning of the instrument, as well as get users familiar with representative data. We designed the MIRI instrument simulator (MIRISim) to mimic the on-orbit performance of the MIRI imager and spectrometers using the Calibration Data Products (CDPs) developed by the MIRI instrument team. The software encorporates accurate representations of the detectors, slicers, distortions, and noise sources along the light path including the telescope's radiative background and cosmic rays. The software also includes a module which enables users to create astronomical scenes to simulate. MIRISim is a publicly available Python package that can be run at the command line, or from within Python. The outputs of MIRISim are detector images in the same uncalibrated data format that will be delivered to MIRI users. These contain the necessary metadata for ingestion by the JWST calibration pipeline.
We present a sample-variance-limited measurement of the temperature power spectrum (TTTT) of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) using observations of a  ⁣1500deg2\sim\! 1500 \,\mathrm{deg}^2 field made by SPT-3G in 2018. We report multifrequency power spectrum measurements at 95, 150, and 220GHz covering the angular multipole range 750 \leq \ell < 3000. We combine this TTTT measurement with the published polarization power spectrum measurements from the 2018 observing season and update their associated covariance matrix to complete the SPT-3G 2018 TT/TE/EETT/TE/EE data set. This is the first analysis to present cosmological constraints from SPT TTTT, TETE, and EEEE power spectrum measurements jointly. We blind the cosmological results and subject the data set to a series of consistency tests at the power spectrum and parameter level. We find excellent agreement between frequencies and spectrum types and our results are robust to the modeling of astrophysical foregrounds. We report results for Λ\LambdaCDM and a series of extensions, drawing on the following parameters: the amplitude of the gravitational lensing effect on primary power spectra ALA_\mathrm{L}, the effective number of neutrino species NeffN_{\mathrm{eff}}, the primordial helium abundance YPY_{\mathrm{P}}, and the baryon clumping factor due to primordial magnetic fields bb. We find that the SPT-3G 2018 T/TE/EET/TE/EE data are well fit by Λ\LambdaCDM with a probability-to-exceed of 15%15\%. For Λ\LambdaCDM, we constrain the expansion rate today to H0=68.3±1.5kms1Mpc1H_0 = 68.3 \pm 1.5\,\mathrm{km\,s^{-1}\,Mpc^{-1}} and the combined structure growth parameter to S8=0.797±0.042S_8 = 0.797 \pm 0.042. The SPT-based results are effectively independent of Planck, and the cosmological parameter constraints from either data set are within <1\,\sigma of each other. (abridged)
We present a systematic search for transiting giant planets ($0.6 R_{\rm J} \leq R_{\rm P} \leq 2.0 R_{\rm J})orbitingnearbylowmassstars() orbiting nearby low-mass stars (M_{*} \leq 0.71 M_{\odot}$). The formation of giant planets around low-mass stars is predicted to be rare by the core-accretion planet formation theory. We search 91,306 low-mass stars in the TESS 30 minute cadence photometry detecting fifteen giant planet candidates, including seven new planet candidates which were not known planets or identified as TOIs prior to our search. Our candidates present an exciting opportunity to improve our knowledge of the giant planet population around the lowest mass stars. We perform planet injection-recovery simulations and find that our pipeline has a high detection efficiency across the majority of our targeted parameter space. We measure the occurrence rates of giant planets with host stars in different stellar mass ranges spanning our full sample. We find occurrence rates of 0.137±0.0970.137 \pm 0.097% (0.088 - 0.26 MM_{\odot}), 0.108±0.0830.108 \pm 0.083% (0.26 - 0.42 MM_{\odot}), and 0.29±0.150.29 \pm 0.15% (0.42 - 0.71 MM_{\odot}). For our full sample (0.088 - 0.71 MM_{\odot}) we find a giant planet occurrence rate of 0.194±0.0720.194 \pm 0.072%. We have measured for the first time the occurrence rate for giant planets orbiting stars with M0.4MM_{*} \leq 0.4 M_{\odot} and we demonstrate this occurrence rate to be non-zero. This result contradicts currently accepted planet formation models and we discuss some possibilities for how these planets could have formed.
We present the results and conclusions from the citizen science competition `Observing Dark Worlds', where we asked participants to calculate the positions of dark matter halos from 120 catalogues of simulated weak lensing galaxy data, using computational methods. In partnership with Kaggle (this http URL), 357 users participated in the competition which saw 2278 downloads of the data and 3358 submissions. We found that the best algorithms improved on the benchmark code, LENSTOOL by > 30% and could measure the positions of > 3x10^14MSun halos to less than 5'' and < 10^14MSun to within 1'. In this paper, we present a brief overview of the winning algorithms with links to available code. We also discuss the implications of the experiment for future citizen science competitions.
Understanding the nature of dark matter in the Universe is an important goal of modern cosmology. A key method for probing this distribution is via weak gravitational lensing mass-mapping - a challenging ill-posed inverse problem where one infers the convergence field from observed shear measurements. Upcoming stage IV surveys, such as those made by the Vera C. Rubin Observatory and Euclid satellite, will provide a greater quantity and precision of data for lensing analyses, necessitating high-fidelity mass-mapping methods that are computationally efficient and that also provide uncertainties for integration into downstream cosmological analyses. In this work we introduce MMGAN, a novel mass-mapping method based on a regularised conditional generative adversarial network (GAN) framework, which generates approximate posterior samples of the convergence field given shear data. We adopt Wasserstein GANs to improve training stability and apply regularisation techniques to overcome mode collapse, issues that otherwise are particularly acute for conditional GANs. We train and validate our model on a mock COSMOS-style dataset before applying it to true COSMOS survey data. Our approach significantly outperforms the Kaiser-Squires technique and achieves similar reconstruction fidelity as alternative state-of-the-art deep learning approaches. Notably, while alternative approaches for generating samples from a learned posterior are slow (e.g. requiring \sim10 GPU minutes per posterior sample), MMGAN can produce a high-quality convergence sample in less than a second.
From the decades of the theoretical studies, it is well known that the formation of the bar triggers the gas funnelling into the central sub-kpc region and leads to the formation of a kinematically cold nuclear stellar disc (NSD). We demonstrate that this mechanism can be used to identify the formation epoch of the Galactic bar, using an N-body/hydrodynamics simulation of an isolated Milky Way-like galaxy. As shown in many previous literature, our simulation shows that the bar formation triggers an intense star formation for ~1 Gyr in the central region, and forms a NSD. As a result, the oldest age limit of the NSD is relatively sharp, and the oldest population becomes similar to the age of the bar. Therefore, the age distribution of the NSD tells us the formation epoch of the bar. We discuss that a major challenge in measuring the age distribution of the NSD in the Milky Way is contamination from other non-negligible stellar components in the central region, such as a classical bulge component. We demonstrate that because the NSD is kinematically colder than the other stellar populations in the Galactic central region, the NSD population can be kinematically distinguished from the other stellar populations, if the 3D velocity of tracer stars are accurately measured. Hence, in addition to the line-of-sight velocities from spectroscopic surveys, the accurate measurements of the transverse velocities of stars are necessary, and hence the near-infrared space astrometry mission, JASMINE, would play a crutial role to identify the formation epoch of the Galactic bar. We also discuss that the accuracy of stellar age estimation is also crucial to measure the oldest limit of the NSD stellar population.
ETH Zurich logoETH ZurichCNRS logoCNRSTohoku University logoTohoku UniversityUniversity of New South WalesUniversity of Amsterdam logoUniversity of AmsterdamUniversity of OsloINFN Sezione di NapoliMonash University logoMonash UniversityChinese Academy of Sciences logoChinese Academy of SciencesKyoto Sangyo UniversityTel Aviv University logoTel Aviv UniversityKEKUniversity College London logoUniversity College LondonUniversity of Oxford logoUniversity of OxfordOsaka University logoOsaka UniversityNagoya University logoNagoya UniversityTokyo University of ScienceRIKEN logoRIKENTata Institute of Fundamental ResearchCSICNASA Goddard Space Flight Center logoNASA Goddard Space Flight CenterColumbia University logoColumbia UniversityINFN Sezione di PisaCurtin UniversityUniversity of Tokyo logoUniversity of TokyoUniversité Paris-Saclay logoUniversité Paris-SaclayFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-NürnbergSorbonne Université logoSorbonne UniversitéUniversity of TurkuDeutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESYCEA logoCEAUniversity of GenevaUniversidade Federal do ABCUniversity of HaifaUniversität WürzburgUniversidad Complutense de MadridUniversità di GenovaTechnische Universität BerlinThe University of ChicagoNicolaus Copernicus Astronomical Center, Polish Academy of SciencesObservatoire de ParisUniversity College DublinINAF - Osservatorio Astrofisico di TorinoUniversité Côte d’AzurDurham University logoDurham UniversityUniversità degli Studi di PaviaUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoJagiellonian UniversitySaha Institute of Nuclear PhysicsInstituto de Astrofísica de CanariasGran Sasso Science Institute (GSSI)University of the WitwatersrandUniversidad de ChileUniversidade de São PauloUniversität HamburgUniversity of BergenRuhr-Universität BochumHarvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics logoHarvard-Smithsonian Center for AstrophysicsINFN, Sezione di TorinoPontificia Universidad Católica de ChileDublin Institute for Advanced StudiesUniversidad de ValparaísoTechnische Universität DortmundPSL Research UniversityUniversidad de La LagunaJosip Juraj Strossmayer University of OsijekIndian Institute of AstrophysicsKonan UniversityInter-University Centre for Astronomy and AstrophysicsTaras Shevchenko National University of KyivINFN Sezione di PerugiaINAF-Istituto di RadioastronomiaUniversidad de JaénINAF – Osservatorio Astronomico di RomaInstitut de Física d’Altes Energies (IFAE)FZU - Institute of Physics of the Czech Academy of SciencesInstituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía (IAA)Max-Planck-Institut für KernphysikUniv. Savoie Mont BlancUniversitá degli Studi dell’InsubriaLaboratório de Instrumentação e Física Experimental de Partículas (LIP)University of NamibiaUniversidade Federal de ItajubáUniversidad de GuadalajaraCentro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas (CIEMAT)Universidad Católica del NorteINFN Sezione di LecceInternational Centre for Radio Astronomy Research (ICRAR)Tuorla ObservatoryEuropean Space Agency (ESA)Anton Pannekoek Institute for AstronomyYerevan Physics InstituteRudjer Boskovic InstituteUniversidad Autónoma de San Luis PotosíCalifornia Polytechnic State University - San Luis ObispoFred Lawrence Whipple ObservatoryAgenzia Spaziale Italiana (ASI)Università di SienaUniversidad Metropolitana de Ciencias de la EducaciónAPCMullard Space Science LaboratoryTechnical University of KosiceUniversidade Federal de PelotasLeopold-Franzens-Universität InnsbruckInstitut de Recherche en Astrophysique et Planétologie (IRAP)Open University of IsraelThe Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology (BIST)Astronomical Institute, Czech Academy of SciencesNamibia University of Science and TechnologyGEPIInstituto de Física de São CarlosKoyama Astronomical ObservatoryErlangen Centre for Astroparticle Physics (ECAP)Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV)ISDCINFN (Sezione di Bari)Institut de Ciències de l’Espai (ICE)National University of LesothoInstitute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics ITEPINAF, Istituto di Astrofisica Spaziale e Fisica Cosmica (IASF) MilanoGRAPPAINAF – Istituto di Astrofisica Spaziale e Fisica Cosmica (IASF) BolognaInstituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Piauí (IFPI)Instituto de Astronomia, Geofísica e Ciências Atmosféricas (IAG)INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico di Palermo “G.S. Vaiana”Universit PSL* North–West UniversityUniversit de ParisSorbonne Paris Cit",Universit Paris DiderotUniversit del SalentoINAF Osservatorio Astronomico di CapodimonteMax Planck Institut fr AstronomieUniversit degli Studi di PadovaUniversit de BordeauxSapienza Universit di RomaINAF Osservatorio Astrofisico di ArcetriUniversit de MontpellierUniversit degli Studi di TorinoUniversit degli Studi di PalermoUniversit e Politecnico di BariUniversit degli Studi di Napoli Federico IIUniversidad de AlcalNational Research Centre “Kurchatov Institute”
The dSphs around the Milky Way are commonly considered as systems that are supported by velocity dispersion against self-gravitation. They have been long accounted among the best targets to search for indirect DM signatures in the GeV-to-TeV gamma-rays due to absence of astrophysical gamma-ray foreground or background emission. We present forecasts on the sensitivity of the future CTAO for the search for annihilating or decaying DM in such targets. We perform an original selection of candidates out of the current catalog of known objects, including both classical and ultra-faint targets. For each of them, we calculate the expected amount of DM using the most updated and complete available samples of photometric and spectroscopic data of member stars, adopting a common framework of data treatment for both classes of objects. In this way, we are able to generate novel astrophysical factor profiles for general indirect DM searches that we compare with the current literature. Out of a starting sample of 64 dSphs, we highlight the 8 most promising targets - DraI, CBe, UMaII, UMi and Wil1 in the Northern hemisphere; RetII, Scl and SgrII in the Southern hemisphere - for which different DM density models (either cored or cuspy) lead to similar expectations, at variance with what happens for other DM targets - thus resulting in more robust predictions. We find that CTAO will provide the strongest limits above ~10 TeV, down to values of velocity-averaged annihilation cross section of ~5×1025 \times 10^{-25} cm3^3 s1^{-1} and up to decay lifetimes of ~1026^{26} s for combined limits on the best targets. We argue that the largest source of inaccuracy is due to the still imprecise determination of the DM content, especially for ultra-faint dSphs. We propose possible strategies of observation for CTAO, either optimized on a deep focus on the best known candidates, or on the diversification of targets.
The precision of Stage IV cosmic shear surveys will enable us to probe smaller physical scales than ever before, however, model uncertainties from baryonic physics and non-linear structure formation will become a significant concern. The kk-cut method -- applying a redshift-dependent \ell-cut after making the Bernardeau-Nishimichi-Taruya transform -- can reduce sensitivity to baryonic physics; allowing Stage IV surveys to include information from increasingly higher \ell-modes. Here we address the question of whether it can also mitigate the impact of making the reduced shear approximation; which is also important in the high-κ\kappa, small-scale regime. The standard procedure for relaxing this approximation requires the repeated evaluation of the convergence bispectrum, and consequently can be prohibitively computationally expensive when included in Monte Carlo analyses. We find that the kk-cut cosmic shear procedure suppresses the w0waw_0w_aCDM cosmological parameter biases expected from the reduced shear approximation for Stage IV experiments, when \ell-modes up to 50005000 are probed. The maximum cut required for biases from the reduced shear approximation to be below the threshold of significance is at k=5.37hMpc1k = 5.37 \, h{\rm Mpc}^{-1}. With this cut, the predicted 1σ1\sigma constraints increase, relative to the case where the correction is directly computed, by less than 10%10\% for all parameters. This represents a significant improvement in constraints compared to the more conservative case where only \ell-modes up to 1500 are probed, and no kk-cut is used. We also repeat this analysis for a hypothetical, comparable kinematic weak lensing survey. The key parts of code used for this analysis are made publicly available.
(Abridged) The abundance ratios between key elements such as iron and alpha-process elements carry a wealth of information on the star formation history (SFH) of galaxies. So far, simple chemical evolution models have linked [alpha/Fe] with the SFH timescale, correlating large abundance ratios with short-lived SFH. We provide an empirical correlation between [alpha/Fe] (measured from spectral indices) and the SFH (determined via a non-parametric spectral-fitting method). We offer an empirical version of the iconic outline of Thomas et al. (2005), relating star formation timescale with galaxy mass, although our results suggest, in contrast, a significant population of old (>10Gyr) stars even for the lowest mass ellipticals. In addition, the abundance ratio is found to be strongly correlated with the time to build up the stellar component, showing that the highest [alpha/Fe] (>+0.2) are attained by galaxies with the shortest half-mass formation time (<2Gyr), or equivalently, with the smallest (<40%) fraction of populations younger than 10Gyr. These observational results support the standard hypothesis that star formation incorporates the Fe-enriched interstellar medium into stars, lowering the high abundance ratio of the old populations.
ETH Zurich logoETH ZurichCNRS logoCNRSCalifornia Institute of Technology logoCalifornia Institute of TechnologyUniversity of OsloUniversity of Cambridge logoUniversity of CambridgeINFN Sezione di NapoliSLAC National Accelerator LaboratoryCarnegie Mellon University logoCarnegie Mellon UniversityUniversity of Manchester logoUniversity of ManchesterUniversity of ZurichUniversity College London logoUniversity College LondonUniversity of California, Irvine logoUniversity of California, IrvineStanford University logoStanford UniversityUniversity of Copenhagen logoUniversity of CopenhagenUniversity of EdinburghNASA Goddard Space Flight Center logoNASA Goddard Space Flight CenterUniversidade de LisboaLancaster UniversityHelsinki Institute of PhysicsUniversity of HelsinkiUppsala UniversityUniversity of TurkuLeiden University logoLeiden UniversityCEA logoCEAUniversit`a degli Studi di PadovaENS de LyonEcole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne (EPFL)KTH Royal Institute of Technology logoKTH Royal Institute of TechnologyUniversit`a degli Studi di GenovaUniversidade do PortoUniversity of SussexTechnical University of DenmarkINAF - Osservatorio Astrofisico di TorinoDurham University logoDurham UniversityUniversity of Groningen logoUniversity of GroningenNiels Bohr InstituteJet Propulsion LaboratoryInstituto de Astrofísica de CanariasSISSAINFN, Sezione di TorinoJodrell Bank Centre for AstrophysicsIN2P3Institute of Astronomy, University of CambridgeLaboratoire LagrangeUniversity of Hawai’iEuropean Space Astronomy Centre (ESAC)INAF – Istituto di Astrofisica e Planetologia SpazialiKapteyn Astronomical InstituteThe Barcelona Institute of Science and TechnologyLaboratoire d’Astrophysique de MarseilleUniversidad Autonoma de MadridINAF – Osservatorio Astronomico di RomaGrenoble-INPInstitut d'Astrophysique de ParisUniversidad de SalamancaInstitut de Física d’Altes Energies (IFAE)IPACInstitut d’Estudis Espacials de Catalunya (IEEC)INFN - Sezione di PadovaObservatoire de la Cˆote d’AzurINAF-IASF MilanoInstitute of Space ScienceUniversidade de CoimbraINFN-Sezione di GenovaLAPThIRAPDTU SpaceEuropean Space Agency (ESA)INFN-Sezione di BolognaKavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and CosmologyUniversite de ToulouseUniversit`a degli Studi di TriesteUniversit`a Degli Studi Di Napoli “Federico II”Leiden ObservatoryINFN-BolognaAIMCPPMUniversit\'e C\^ote d'AzurUniversite de LyonUPS-OMPMullard Space Science LaboratoryInstitute for AstronomySpace Science Data Center – ASILPSC-IN2P3Institut de Ciencies de l’Espai (ICE-CSIC)Universit`a degli Studi di FerraraInstitute of Theoretical AstrophysicsCentre de Physique des Particules de MarseilleDARK Cosmology CentreAix-Marseille Universit\'eMcWilliams Center for CosmologyUniversit‘a della CalabriaInstitute for Computational Science, University of ZurichCentre de Recherche Astrophysique de Lyon UMR5574Institut de Physique Nucleaire de LyonCentre National d’Etudes Spatiales (CNES)Universitat InnsbruckUniversidad Politecnica de CartagenaInstituto de Astrofísica e Ciˆencias do Espa̧coUniversit`a degli Studi di Milano StataleUniversit´e Paris Cit´eInstituto de F́ısica Téorica UAM/CSICPort d’Informaci´o Cient´ıfica (PIC)Serco ESA Technical GMBHLaboratoire d’Astrophysique (LASTRO)Universit´e de Grenoble AlpesCentro de F´ısica das Universidades de CoimbraInstitut f¨ur Astro- und TeilchenphysikCentre de Donn´ees astronomiques de StrasbourgUniversit´e Claude Bernard (Lyon 1)Alma Mater Studiorum · Università di BolognaCosmic Dawn Center(DAWN)INAF Osservatorio Astronomico di CapodimonteUniversit at BonnUniversité Paris-SaclayMax Planck-Institute for Extraterrestrial PhysicsINAF Osservatorio Astrofisico di ArcetriLudwig-Maximilians-Universit ¨at M ¨unchenMax Planck Institut fur AstronomieINAF Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di BolognaArgelander Institut f ür AstronomieIFPU Institute for fundamental physics of the UniverseINFN Sezione di TriesteINAF ` Osservatorio Astronomico di TriesteUniversite de GeneveUniversita' degli Studi di TorinoUniversité Savoie-Mont BlancINAF Osservatorio Astronomico di Brera“Sapienza" Università di RomaSorbonne Université
To date, galaxy image simulations for weak lensing surveys usually approximate the light profiles of all galaxies as a single or double Sérsic profile, neglecting the influence of galaxy substructures and morphologies deviating from such a simplified parametric characterization. While this approximation may be sufficient for previous data sets, the stringent cosmic shear calibration requirements and the high quality of the data in the upcoming Euclid survey demand a consideration of the effects that realistic galaxy substructures have on shear measurement biases. Here we present a novel deep learning-based method to create such simulated galaxies directly from HST data. We first build and validate a convolutional neural network based on the wavelet scattering transform to learn noise-free representations independent of the point-spread function of HST galaxy images that can be injected into simulations of images from Euclid's optical instrument VIS without introducing noise correlations during PSF convolution or shearing. Then, we demonstrate the generation of new galaxy images by sampling from the model randomly and conditionally. Next, we quantify the cosmic shear bias from complex galaxy shapes in Euclid-like simulations by comparing the shear measurement biases between a sample of model objects and their best-fit double-Sérsic counterparts. Using the KSB shape measurement algorithm, we find a multiplicative bias difference between these branches with realistic morphologies and parametric profiles on the order of 6.9×1036.9\times 10^{-3} for a realistic magnitude-Sérsic index distribution. Moreover, we find clear detection bias differences between full image scenes simulated with parametric and realistic galaxies, leading to a bias difference of 4.0×1034.0\times 10^{-3} independent of the shape measurement method. This makes it relevant for stage IV weak lensing surveys such as Euclid.
In a previous work [arXiv:2009.03428] we proposed a new model for Quantum GRavity(QGR) and cosmology, dubbed SU()SU(\infty)-QGR. One of the axioms of this model is that Hilbert spaces of the Universe and its subsystems represent SU()SU(\infty) symmetry group. In this framework, the classical spacetime is interpreted as being the parameter space characterizing states of the SU()SU(\infty) representing Hilbert spaces. Using quantum uncertainty relations, it is shown that the parameter space - the spacetime - has a 3+1 dimensional Lorentzian geometry. Here after a review of SU()SU(\infty)-QGR, including the demonstration that its classical limit is Einstein gravity, we compare it with several QGR proposals, including: string and M-theories, loop quantum gravity and related models, and QGR proposals inspired by holographic principle and quantum entanglement. The purpose is to find their common and analogous features, even if they apparently seem to have different roles and interpretations. The hope is that such exercise gives a better understanding of gravity as a universal quantum force and clarifies the physical nature of the spacetime. We identify several common features among the studied models: importance of 2D structures; algebraic decomposition to tensor products; special role of SU(2)SU(2) group in their formulation; necessity of a quantum time as a relational observable. We discuss how these features can be considered as analogous in different models. We also show that they arise in SU()SU(\infty)-QGR without fine-tuning, additional assumptions, or restrictions.
There are no more papers matching your filters at the moment.