Case 03 of the Special Jurisdiction for Peace (JEP), focused on the so-called
false positives in Colombia, represents one of the most harrowing episodes of
the Colombian armed conflict. This article proposes an innovative methodology
based on natural language analysis and semantic co-occurrence models to
explore, systematize, and visualize narrative patterns present in the public
hearings of victims and appearing parties. By constructing skipgram networks
and analyzing their modularity, the study identifies thematic clusters that
reveal regional and procedural status differences, providing empirical evidence
on dynamics of victimization, responsibility, and acknowledgment in this case.
This computational approach contributes to the collective construction of both
judicial and extrajudicial truth, offering replicable tools for other
transitional justice cases. The work is grounded in the pillars of truth,
justice, reparation, and non-repetition, proposing a critical and in-depth
reading of contested memories.